Utilitarianism V. Kantianism
Title: Utilitarianism V. Kantianism
Category: /Society & Culture/People
Details: Words: 1341 | Pages: 5 (approximately 235 words/page)
Utilitarianism V. Kantianism
Category: /Society & Culture/People
Details: Words: 1341 | Pages: 5 (approximately 235 words/page)
Ethics can be defined as "the conscious reflection on our moral beliefs with the aim of improving, extending or refining those beliefs in some way." (Dodds, Lecture 2) Kantian moral theory and Utilitarianism are two theories that attempt to answer the ethical nature of human beings. This paper will attempt to explain how and why Kantian moral theory and Utilitarianism differ as well as discuss why I believe Kant's theory provides a more plausible account of
showed first 75 words of 1341 total
You are viewing only a small portion of the paper.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
showed last 75 words of 1341 total
Because of these reasons, I believe that Kantianism is the more ethically plausible theory of the two.
Bibliography
Susan Dodds, Lecture 2 notes, 'Utilitarianism.' Susan Dodds, Lecture 7 notes, 'Kantianism.' Fred Feldman, 'Kant's Ethics Theory: Exposition and Critique' from H. J. Curzer, ed Ethical Theory and Moral Problems, Belmont, Ca: Wadsworth Publishing Co. 1999. J.S. Mill, 'What Utilitarianism Is' from Peter Y. Windt, An Introduction to Philosophy: Ideas in Conflict, St Paul, MN: West Publishing, 1982.