Lincoln's use of executive authority during the Civil War "Was Lincoln's use of executive authority during the civil war constitutional?" By: David Aslam
Title: Lincoln's use of executive authority during the Civil War "Was Lincoln's use of executive authority during the civil war constitutional?" By: David Aslam
Category: /History/North American History
Details: Words: 621 | Pages: 2 (approximately 235 words/page)
Lincoln's use of executive authority during the Civil War "Was Lincoln's use of executive authority during the civil war constitutional?" By: David Aslam
Category: /History/North American History
Details: Words: 621 | Pages: 2 (approximately 235 words/page)
Executive Authority:
Lincoln's use of executive authority during the Civil War was almost always legal and justified. Though some of his acts did ride the line between legal and illegal politics his use of executive authority was always justified and, though it can be argued that some of his policies were illegal, they were never morally wrong. His suspension of habeas corpus was, by far, the most controversial but was necessary because of the current
showed first 75 words of 621 total
You are viewing only a small portion of the paper.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
showed last 75 words of 621 total
could be said to be illegal they all provided for increased national security and, therefore, are justified and should be held to without question. His suspension of habeas corpus, his restriction of the press, his call for a draft and the emancipation proclamation were all justified by a greater need to preserve the union. Without these bold acts Lincoln would have been allowing our country to destroy itself and what the founding fathers had created.