Argument against the case an accounting standard to regulate the way in which complex financial instruments are reported in the financial statements of quoted companies

Title: Argument against the case an accounting standard to regulate the way in which complex financial instruments are reported in the financial statements of quoted companies
Category: /Law & Government/Government & Politics
Details: Words: 2355 | Pages: 9 (approximately 235 words/page)
Argument against the case an accounting standard to regulate the way in which complex financial instruments are reported in the financial statements of quoted companies
INTRODUCTION : In this essay, I would like to start with a brief explanation about the accounting regulation and standards set for various treatments consists of gaps where the rules are vague or even incomplete. Then, I would like to give a brief introduction about the development of standards set for capital instrument, such as TR677 (ICAEW), FRED 3 and FRS 4. Next, I will go into details examining the problems found in these proposals and standard, especially …showed first 75 words of 2355 total…
You are viewing only a small portion of the paper.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
…showed last 75 words of 2355 total…Andrew Marshall, and Tony Puxty, (1991), 'NFIs: Treatment and Disclosure', Accountancy, January, pp. 66-67 Atul K. Shah, (1997), Regulatory Arbitrage Through Financial Innovation', Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 85-104 Andrew Lennard, (1992), 'Debt, equity or something else?' Accountancy Chris Westwich, (1994), 'What is the profit on repurchase of debt?' Accountancy, June, pp. 124-125 Barry Johnson, (1994), 'Practical Problems With FRS 4', Accountancy, June, pp. 124-125 Roger Wood, (1993), 'A View From the Broadroom', Accountancy, July, pp. 96-97

Need a custom written paper?