A critique of the article "Psychosocial evaluation and prediction of compliance problems and morbidity after heart transplantation", written by Shapiro et al.
Title: A critique of the article "Psychosocial evaluation and prediction of compliance problems and morbidity after heart transplantation", written by Shapiro et al.
Category: /Social Sciences/Psychology
Details: Words: 1728 | Pages: 6 (approximately 235 words/page)
A critique of the article "Psychosocial evaluation and prediction of compliance problems and morbidity after heart transplantation", written by Shapiro et al.
Category: /Social Sciences/Psychology
Details: Words: 1728 | Pages: 6 (approximately 235 words/page)
In the journal article "Psychosocial evaluation and prediction of compliance problems and morbidity after heart transplantation", the authors attempt to answer the question of whether preoperative psychosocial evaluations have reliable predictive value for heart transplant outcomes (Shapiro et al., 1995). Organ transplant programs use differing selection criteria and screening procedures to establish which patients are within established risk factor limits to safely receive and benefit from heart transplantation surgery. Such screening is necessary due to fact
showed first 75 words of 1728 total
You are viewing only a small portion of the paper.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
showed last 75 words of 1728 total
Gelman, N. Wukich and R. Sciacca, Psychosocial evaluation, and prediction of compliance problems, and morbidity after heart transplantation. Transplantation 60 (1995), pp. 1462-1466.
Shemesh E, Shneider BL, Stuber ML, et al., A pilot study of symptoms of post traumatic stress disorder and nonadherence in pediatric liver transplant recipients. Pediatrics 2000;105:e29 1-7.
Shemesh et al., A prospective study of posttraumatic stress symptoms and nonadherence in survivors of a myocardial infarction (MI). General Hospital Psychiatry Vol. 23 (July-Auguest 2001), pp. 215-222.